The following are articles that I wrote for ViewsHound-a writing site based in UK that closed on December 23, 2011. I started writing for the site last August publishing 57 articles and 4 photographs.It was an experienced I will never forget. Some photos in this site, I do not own. However, I have no intention on infringing your copyrights.
When Algorithms Meet the Battlefield: Why Tech Is Pushing Back on AI for War
For decades, technology companies proudly described themselves as neutral builders of tools, keyboards, search engines, cloud servers, code. But this week, that long-standing illusion finally cracked.
Across Silicon Valley and Washington, a public standoff has emerged over one of the most uncomfortable questions of our time:
Should artificial intelligence be used to fight wars and if so, who gets to decide how far it goes?
What makes this moment different is not just the technology involved, but the resistance coming from inside the tech industry itself.
A Line in the Sand
At the center of the controversy is Anthropic, an AI firm that has refused to allow its models to be used for unrestricted military purposes. The company argues that without firm safeguards, advanced AI could be used for autonomous weapons, mass surveillance, or battlefield decision-making without meaningful human oversight.
The response from the Pentagon has been swift and severe, with officials warning that limiting access to AI could weaken national security in an era increasingly described as an “AI arms race.”
This is no longer a quiet contract negotiation. It is a philosophical clash, ethics versus urgency, restraint versus power.
The Military’s Argument: Speed Is Survival
From the perspective of the U.S. Department of Defense, AI is not optional. It promises faster intelligence analysis, predictive logistics, and real-time decision support on increasingly complex battlefields.
Military leaders warn that adversaries are already racing ahead and that hesitation could come at a deadly cost.
But critics counter that speed without accountability has consequences, especially when decisions involve life and death.
Tech Workers Speak Out
What truly marks a turning point is the reaction from employees across the industry.
Engineers and researchers from companies like Google and OpenAI have signed open letters and petitions supporting stronger limits on military AI use. Many argue they did not enter the field to build systems that could one day decide who lives or dies.
This echoes earlier protests over surveillance technology and drone warfare, but with far higher stakes.
Not All Tech Companies Agree
While some firms are drawing ethical red lines, others are moving in the opposite direction.
OpenAI, for example, has recently entered agreements allowing its models to operate within classified government networks. Supporters say this proves ethical AI and national defense can coexist. Critics worry it normalizes military dependence on systems that were never meant to make lethal decisions.
The result? A fractured tech industry, no longer united by a single vision of progress.
Why This Moment Matters
This debate isn’t just about war. It’s about governance.
Who controls powerful AI systems?
Can private companies say “no” to governments?
Do engineers have moral agency over what they create?
And most importantly: can humanity slow down long enough to decide how far is too far?
History suggests that once a technology becomes possible, it eventually becomes used. But history also reminds us that choices made early shape decades to come.
A Personal Reflection
For years, we celebrated innovation as an unquestioned good. Faster. Smarter. More powerful. But AI forces us to confront an uncomfortable truth:
Progress without values is not progress at all.
The real battle unfolding right now isn’t between nations. It’s between competing visions of what technology is for and whether human judgment still has a place in the age of algorithms.
Closing Thought
This standoff may fade from headlines or it may define a generation of technology governance. Either way, the question will remain long after today’s news cycle ends:
When machines grow more powerful, will human restraint grow with them?
Finally,
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced late Friday that the company had signed a deal with the Pentagon for its AI tools to be used in the military's classified systems, hours after President Trump told federal agencies to stop using rival Anthropic's tech. https://cnn.it/3OBAKCl
My Photo of the Day:
Grand Six-Planet Alignment Begins February 28!
The sky will treat us to a rare planetary parade on the evening of February 28! Just after sunset, six planets will appear lined up across the western horizon, creating a spectacular cosmic display. Visible in the lineup will be Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, and with binoculars Uranus.
Though the planets aren’t perfectly aligned in space, from Earth they’ll look like a beautifully choreographed celestial line.
To catch the rare six-planet alignment on February 28, you want to head outside about 30-45 minutes after sunset. Since sunset is around 5:38 PM, you should look up between 6:08 PM and 6:23 PM.
The top Five News of the Day:
1. U.S. and Israel launch a major attack on Iran — The United States and Israel have begun significant military strikes inside Iran, with explosions reported near Tehran and other cities. President Trump stated “major combat operations” are underway and urged Iranians to rise against their government. The strikes have prompted immediate regional tensions.
2. Pakistan says it is in “open war” with Afghanistan — Pakistan’s defense minister publicly declared his country is engaged in an “open war” with Afghanistan, underscoring escalating military tensions in South Asia.
3. U.S. Senator criticizes strikes on Iran — Virginia Senator Tim Kaine called the military strikes on Iran “a colossal mistake,” highlighting rising political debate in the U.S. over the decision to use force.
4. Los Angeles schools superintendent placed on paid leave — Alberto Carvalho, head of the Los Angeles Unified School District, has been placed on paid leave amid a federal investigation, a significant development in U.S. education and governance.
5. Missing mother and 1-year-old son found safe — A missing Milwaukee mother and her young child, missing since early February, were located and reported safe by police in a positive resolution to a widely followed local missing persons case.
Season 50 of the CBS most popular TV reality show premiered last night. I have been a fan of this show since Season 1. Here's my blog post why the show has been very popular and has won numerous Emmy awards.
Why Survivor Still Captivates the World at Season 50
Last night, Survivor reached a milestone few television shows scripted or unscripted ever achieve: Season 50. For longtime fans like me, who have been watching since Season 1, this moment feels both surreal and deeply satisfying. For newer viewers around the world, it raises a fair question:
Why has Survivor remained one of the most popular and award-winning TV shows for a quarter-century?
The answer lies in a powerful mix of human psychology, smart storytelling, and constant reinvention.
A Social Experiment Disguised as Entertainment
At its core, Survivor is not just a reality show, it’s a social experiment.
Strangers from different backgrounds are stranded together, stripped of modern comforts, and forced to:
Build alliances
Navigate trust and betrayal
Balance morality with strategy
Every season becomes a living case study in human behavior under pressure, something audiences across cultures instantly recognize.
Strategy That Evolves With the Times
Early seasons focused on survival and simple alliances. Over the years, the game has grown into a complex strategic battlefield, introducing:
Hidden Immunity Idols
Strategic vote splits
Blindsides and fake-outs
Risk-versus-reward twists
Yet despite these layers, the show remains accessible. You don’t need a rulebook, you just need to understand people.
That balance between depth for superfans and clarity for casual viewers is rare and intentional.
Masterful Storytelling, Not Just Reality TV
One reason Survivor has won numerous Emmy Awards is its storytelling.
Each season is carefully edited to create:
Heroes and villains
Redemption arcs
Tragic downfalls
Shocking triumphs
Unlike many reality shows, Survivor respects its audience. It trusts viewers to follow long-term narratives and emotional nuance rather than relying solely on spectacle.
A Gold Standard of Reality Television
Awards matter because they reflect peer recognition and Survivor has plenty:
Multiple Primetime Emmy Awards
Consistent critical acclaim
Frequent placement on “greatest TV shows” lists
In an industry where most reality shows fade after a few seasons, Survivor became the template others copied and rarely matched.
Reinvention Without Losing Its Soul
Fifty seasons in, the show still feels fresh because it evolves without abandoning its DNA.
Locations change. Twists shift. Casting becomes more diverse and global. But the core question remains the same:
How far will you go to win and who will you become along the way?
That timeless question keeps viewers coming back.
A Shared Global Experience
For fans around the world, Survivor is more than a show, it’s a ritual:
Family watch nights
Office pool discussions
Online debates and rankings
And for those of us who’ve been there since the beginning, Season 50 isn’t just another premiere. It’s a reminder of how powerful great television can be when it respects both its contestants and its audience.
Final Thought
In an era of short attention spans and endless content, Survivor has done the impossible: it endured. Season 50 is not just a celebration of longevity, it’s proof that compelling human stories, told well, never go out of style.
Here’s to the outwit, outplay, and outlast now and for seasons still to come. 🏝️🔥
Meanwhile, here's a list of All the Winners (Seasons 1–46 and beyond)
Since its debut in 2000, Survivor has crowned dozens of “Sole Survivors” contestants who outplayed 17–19 others in social, strategic, and physical competition to win the grand prize. Most seasons award a $1 million prize to the winner; in the season 40 special Winners at War, the winner (Tony Vlachos) received $2 million.
Here is the official list of most of the winners through Survivor 46 (per Fubo’s extensive tally):
Season 1: Richard Hatch
Season 2: Tina Wesson
Season 3: Ethan Zohn
Season 4: Vecepia Towery
Season 5: Brian Heidik
Season 6: Jenna Morasca
Season 7: Sandra Diaz-Twine
Season 8: Amber Brkich
Season 9: Chris Daugherty
Season 10: Tom Westman
Season 11: Danni Boatwright
Season 12: Aras Baskauskas
Season 13: Yul Kwon
… (list continues through all seasons up to #46)
Season 45: Dee Valladares
Season 46: Kenzie Petty (Note:Survivor 49 winner Savannah Louie was crowned in December 2025 and appears in Survivor 50.)
Two players, Sandra Diaz-Twine and Tony Vlachos have each won twice: Sandra in Pearl Islands and Heroes vs Villains, and Tony in Cagayan and Winners at War.
Where Many Winners Are Now (Post-Show Lives)
Here’s a snapshot of how some of the Survivor champions have built their lives since winning:
Early Winners
Richard Hatch (Season 1): Became one of the first Survivor icons and returned to multiple reality shows. His life also included legal trouble related to unpaid taxes on winnings.
Tina Wesson (Season 2): Lives a quieter life teaching survival skills and enjoying family time.
Ethan Zohn (Season 3): Battled and beat cancer, returned to Survivor and reality TV; has remained active in charity work and media.
Sandra Diaz-Twine (Seasons 7 & 20): The first two-time winner, now focused on family and community life; she jokes her wins allow her to relax and “not do a damn thing.”
Amber Brkich Mariano (Season 8): Married fellow Survivor star “Boston” Rob Mariano; they live in Florida and have four daughters.
Middle Eras
Yul Kwon (Season 13): Built a career in law, government, business, and entrepreneurship; he’s also served in leadership roles, including at the FCC.
Chris Daugherty (Season 9): Returned to normal life in Ohio, built a home with his winnings.
Tom Westman (Season 10): Retired from firefighting and works in insurance; his Survivor win is part of his personal story but not his primary career identity.
Newer Winners (41–46 Era)
Erika Casupanan (Season 41): Became a podcast host and community voice after winning.
Maryanne Oketch (Season 42): Married and started medical school after her win.
Mike Gabler (Season 43): Donated his entire $1 million prize to veteran-related charities.
Yamil “Yam Yam” Arocho (Season 44): Owns a beauty salon and stays involved in creative ventures.
Dee Valladares (Season 45): Works as an influencer and podcast co-host.
Kenzie Petty (Season 46): Runs a hair salon and has started a family.
Most Recent
Savannah Louie (Season 49): The December 2025 winner transitioned from journalism to marketing and continues to compete in Survivor 50. Incidentally, Savannah is from Walnut Creek, CA.
Did Winners Keep Their Winnings?
Yes, in general, winners keep their prize money, but with a few important notes:
Winners receive their prize only after the season airs (even if they know the result during filming). This is done to prevent spoilers and enforce confidentiality.
Winners are responsible for their taxes and reporting as Richard Hatch learned the hard way in the early 2000s, failing to report winnings can lead to legal trouble.
Some winners choose to use the money in various ways from paying off debts or investing to donating to charities (like Mike Gabler did).
Final Takeaways
✔ Survivor has crowned dozens of winners across 50 seasons, from everyday people to reality TV vets. ✔ Many champions have used their prize money wisely but kept it and gone on to meaningful careers in diverse fields. ✔ Some winners have become cultural icons, returned for all-star seasons, or expanded into media, business, or philanthropy. ✔ A few winners like Mike Gabler, even chose to give the money away for causes they care about.
Looking forward with great anticipation the coming episodes of Season 50.
Based on analytics and expert opinions, the top contenders for winning Survivor 50 are:
Top Contenders:
Aubry Bracco: With a 10% win probability, Aubry occupies the strongest statistical archetype in returnee history - a mid-era strategic bridge. She's likely to survive the first three Tribals (82% of the time) and has a flat threat curve early on, which is ideal for winning.
Christian Hubicki: Christian has a 9.5% win probability, with a high pre-season approval rating and built-in social capital. His danger lies in the late game, making him a strong contender.
Joe Hunter: With an 8.4% win probability, Joe's loyal-game reputation lowers immediate threat perception. He's positioned as everyone's No. 2, which is statistically the most powerful seat in Survivor.
Other notable players include :
Chrissy Hofbeck: A strong challenge player who finished as runner-up in Season 35. If she can play a more socially and strategically aware game, she has a good chance to
win.
Cirie Fields: With a 7.5% win probability, Cirie's legendary PTI and universally high Relationship Density Score make her a strong contender if she survives the first three Tribals.
Coach Wade: With an 8% win probability, Coach benefits from near-universal openness to working with him, which could give him an edge in the game.
Rick Devens: A fan favorite who played a strong game in Season 38. If he can replicate his previous performance, he has a good chance to win .
Season 50 of
Survivor (set for spring 2026) is expected to feature 13 episodes. The milestone season features 24 returning players, starting with a 3-hour premiere on February 25, 2026, followed by weekly 90-minute episodes. The season is scheduled to conclude with a finale on May 20, 2026.
Key Details for Survivor 50:
Total Episodes: Likely 13 (including the premiere and finale).
Premiere: A 3-hour episode aired on February 25, 2026.
Run Time: Subsequent episodes will be 90 minutes long.
Cast: 24 returning players.
Finale Date: Expected on May 20, 2026.
Special Guests: Appearances from Zac Brown, MrBeast, Billie Eilish, and Jimmy Fallon
Here's a summary of Trumps State of the Union Address
🇺🇸 A Nation Addressed: Trump’s 2026 State of the Union
February 24, 2026 — Washington, D.C.
Last night, President Donald Trump delivered his first official State of the Union address of his second presidential term before a joint session of the U.S. Congress. At 1 hour and 48 minutes, it became the longest State of the Union speech in American history.
With midterm elections looming later this year and the country deeply polarized, the address was designed to rally his political base, set the agenda for 2026, and defend his record but it also drew sharp criticism and controversyfrom across the political spectrum.
🟢 HIGHLIGHTS: What Trump & Supporters Applauded
🔹 An Assertive Opening Message
Trump kicked off by declaring that “our nation is back, bigger, better, richer, and stronger than ever before”, framing his first year back in office as a “turnaround for the ages.”
This narrative became the backbone of the speech:
A strong economy with falling inflation and rising incomes (as Trump described it).
Job creation and reduced dependency on government support.
A secure border and stronger law enforcement.
🏅 Honoring Military & American Heroes
Trump used the moment to spotlight individuals who embodied service and sacrifice. Military members and veterans, including a 100-year-old Korean War hero awarded the Medal of Honor, received prolonged bipartisan applause.
Trump also honored National Guard members wounded in the line of duty, offering emotional moments that resonated across party lines.
💊 Healthcare & Prescription Costs
In a major policy push, the president touted his “TrumpRx” initiative aimed at lowering prescription drug prices by tying U.S. costs to the lowest prices in other countries. He introduced recipients of these savings as human proof of success.
🌍 Foreign Policy & National Security
Trump took a hard line on foreign threats, especially regarding Iran’s nuclear ambitions, portraying them as a top security concern and affirming U.S. military strength.
📊 Economic & Policy Achievements
His speech also covered:
A strong focus on economic revival.
Emphasis on deregulation and employment growth.
Border security reforms and immigration enforcement.
Criticism of the Affordable Care Act, which he labeled beneficial only to insurance companies.
🔴 LOWLIGHTS: What Critics Called Out
Partisan Tone & Polarization
Rather than offering a unifying message, the address often played more like a political rally than a national overview. Dissent from Democratic lawmakers from visible protests in the chamber to walkouts underscored the deep divide.
Length & Substance Debate
Though long, many commentators argued the speech was heavy on rhetoric and light on concrete plans, especially on pressing domestic issues like affordability and healthcare access.
It was also the longest State of the Union ever delivered, a record that drew both curiosity and criticism for its pacing and length.
Controversial Rhetoric
Some statements about immigration and specific crimes were fact-checked and disputed by independent outlets, fueling claims that portions of the speech leaned toward exaggeration or misinformation.
Climate & Environment Ignored
Environmental advocacy groups noted that Trump’s remarks on energy focused heavily on increased fossil fuel production while avoiding deeper engagement on climate change concerns — a growing global issue.
Global Reaction
Internationally, some nations notably Iran accused the administration of spreading inaccurate claims regarding their nuclear program, pushing back sharply on Trump’s statements.
The Big Picture
Trump’s speech was both a showcase of accomplishments and a political manifesto — written against the backdrop of:
Midterm elections that could reshape Congress.
High inflation and economic anxiety among many Americans.
Escalating global tensions, especially in the Middle East.
Supporters walked away feeling energized, with Trump’s claims backed by applause and chants of “USA.” Critics saw a speech filled with rhetorical flourishes and divisive rhetoric, arguing it glossed over real hardships most citizens still feel.
In short, it was a moment of intense political theater as much as it was civic address, reflecting a nation sharply divided on policy, identity, and leadership.
Meanwhile,
Here’s a fact-checked breakdown of the key claims Donald Trump made during his State of the Union address on February 24, 2026, including what independent reporters and experts verified, questioned, or contradicted based on data from official sources and independent analysis:
1. The Economy — Growth, Jobs & Inflation
Claim:“More Americans are working today than at any time in history.” Fact Check:
✔️ It’s technically true that total employment numbers are historically high — the U.S. has more employed people than ever — but economists note this is largely tied to population growth, not a proportionally stronger labor market. For example, the employment rate and labor force participation haven’t dramatically improved.
Claim:“I secured commitments for more than $18 trillion in global investments.” Fact Check:
❌ This figure is exaggerated and unverified. The White House’s own list showed about $9.6–$9.7 trillion in investment announcements, but even that is an inflated total that includes planned projects from previous administrations and vague economic pledges.
Claim:“Inflation is plummeting.” Fact Check:
⚠️ Partially true but misleading. Inflation has eased compared with prior years, but prices overall remain higher than pre-pandemic levels, and not all goods and services have seen costs fall significantly.
2. Crime & Public Safety
Claim:“The murder rate saw its single largest decline in recorded history.”
Fact Check: ✔️ Early crime data suggests a substantial one-year drop in homicides, potentially the largest on record. ⚠️ Whether it’s “the lowest in 125 years” is questionable due to changes in how crime statistics were gathered over the decades.
Claim:“We have almost no crime in Washington, D.C.” Fact Check: ❌ This exaggerates the situation. Crime has fallen but not to near-zero levels; violent and property crimes still occur at notable rates.
3. Immigration & Border Claims
Claim:“In the past nine months, zero illegal aliens have been admitted.” Fact Check:
⚠️ This is misleading. Border Patrol hasn’t released migrants into the U.S. for months, but it doesn’t mean no one has entered illegally — many are detained or removed, and others might evade detection entirely.
Claim:“Illegal immigration brought murderers and criminals here.” Fact Check:
❌ There’s no evidence that migrants arriving (legally or illegally) came directly from prisons or mental institutions in significant numbers, and the claim of an exact murder count tied to recent migration is not supported by public data.
4. Prescription Drug Prices & Healthcare
Claim:“We are ending wildly inflated prescription drug costs.” Fact Check:
⚠️ Some specific drugs are cheaper through new policies like “TrumpRx” or most-favored-nation pricing, but reporting shows drug prices aren’t universally the lowest in the world and broader cost reductions across all prescriptions haven’t been documented.
5. Foreign Policy & Peace Claims
Claim:“I ended eight wars.” Fact Check:
❌ This significantly overstates U.S. influence. Some ceasefires were brokered and Trump claims credit for peace in several regions — but many conflicts remain unresolved, and some never escalated to formal war in the first place.
❌ The exact number of protest deaths in Iran is in dispute. Independent estimates range broadly but generally fall well below the figure cited by Trump.
6. Taxes, Social Security & Voting
Claim:“We eliminated tax on tips, overtime, and Social Security.” Fact Check:
⚠️ Some tax changes reduce taxes for many Americans, but not all Social Security recipients qualify, and the benefits phase out based on income.
Claim:“Illegal aliens are ravaging U.S. elections.” Fact Check: ❌ There’s no evidence of “rampant” noncitizen voting; independent reviews show such cases are extremely rare.
Summary of Fact-Check Themes
✔️ Some claims had accurate kernels of data (e.g., reductions in homicide rates, some inflation easing). ⚠️ Many assertions were true but framed in misleading ways (e.g., economic growth, immigration results). ❌ Several statements were false or unsupported by credible evidence (e.g., $18 trillion in new investments, rampant election fraud).
Takeaway
Trump’s speech mixed verifiable achievements with exaggerated figures and contested claims. Many of the headline numbers he offered reflect political framing more than neutral statistical reality. Fact-checked reporting highlights that understanding this speech requires careful separation of political rhetoric from independent data.
